AC Milan versus Atalanta, Serie A
Main Outcome · settledBTTS no
Both teams to score
ConvictionBTTS no
Both teams to score
Every leg is one of this fixture’s own SharpCast Picks, combined and priced on the correlation between them — the structural edge bookmakers miss because they price each leg as if it were independent.
Result markets
The model leans Atalanta +2 at 82 percent, close to a coin flip. This is the model's line, not a recommended bet.
The model leans Either team to win at 74 percent, close to a coin flip. This is the model's line, not a recommended bet.
The model leans Atalanta draw no bet at 50 percent, close to a coin flip. This is the model's line, not a recommended bet.
The model leans Atalanta to win at 32 percent, close to a coin flip. This is the model's line, not a recommended bet.
Goals markets
The model rates BTTS no at 48%. The bookmakers have not priced this market here, so the fair price shown is the model’s own and the read stands alone. It falls out of an expected 1.40 goals for the home side and 1.41 for the away (2.81 total) across the simulated scorelines.
The model leans Over 3.5 at 31 percent, close to a coin flip. This is the model's line, not a recommended bet.
0-4 is the most likely exact score consistent with the rest of our read on this match, at 1% on the scoreline matrix. Correct score is a long-odds market, shown as the model's line.
Combined markets
The model leans Atalanta to win and BTTS no at 19 percent, close to a coin flip. This is the model's line, not a recommended bet.
Each settled row is tinted and badged by whether the filed pick landed. The board is the locked record and does not move.
The win band is the model’s sampling range over 10,000 simulations, not a market quote.
Showing the filed assumptions. Toggle the input to see the distribution recompute as a client side estimate, not the filed model.
| Side | Scored | Conceded |
|---|---|---|
| AAC Milan | 1.4actual 2 | 1.4actual 3 |
| AAtalanta | 1.4actual 3 | 1.4actual 2 |
Expected goals is the model’s projected scoring rate for each side. Conceded is the opponent’s projection.
0 to 3 goals · 69% of simulations
Most likely 2 goals.
Model probabilities from the projected distribution; fair price excludes the bookmaker margin. The filed selection for every market is in All Markets above.
3W 3D 4L in the last 10 meetings
From both sides' cards per game over the last 4+ matches, shrunk toward the league baseline.
- Over / Under 3.5 cardsO 60%·U 40%
- Over / Under 4.5 cardsO 40%·U 60%
- Over / Under 5.5 cardsO 24%·U 76%
- Over / Under 6.5 cardsO 13%·U 87%
This call rests on Dixon Coles strength, time decayed form, expected goals and the de overrounded market consensus, across 10,000 simulated matches. It was locked before kickoff and is kept on this site.